docs(en): merge docs-cn/sync-docs into docs-cn/dev @ 93d506c0#971
docs(en): merge docs-cn/sync-docs into docs-cn/dev @ 93d506c0#971docschina-bot wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
…mplementation (#10288) Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: sheremet-va <16173870+sheremet-va@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
…ternal on node (#10243) Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
❌ Deploy Preview for cn-vitest failed.
|
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: a885f26318
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ::: tip | ||
| <<<<<<< HEAD |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This section still contains unresolved conflict markers (<<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>), so the docs will publish raw merge artifacts instead of a coherent paragraph. In this file it also sits inside a ::: tip block, making the rendered guidance unreliable and hard to read for users until one side is selected and the markers are removed.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| <<<<<<< HEAD |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The expect.poll description includes unresolved merge conflict markers, which leaves two competing versions of the text in the page and exposes internal merge syntax to readers. This is a direct content regression in the API reference and should be resolved to a single finalized description.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
|
||
| ::: | ||
|
|
||
| <<<<<<< HEAD |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The guide index contains unresolved merge markers around the requirements tip, so the page now includes raw conflict text and two contradictory requirement statements. Because this is inside a VitePress admonition block, leaving it unresolved can also disrupt the intended block structure and confuse readers about the actual minimum versions.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
此 PR 自动生成。
合并 vitest-dev/docs-cn 的修改至本仓库（@ 93d506c）
以下文件存在冲突，可能需要重新翻译：
请解决所有冲突后提交到此 pull request，可直接在 Github 修改、切换到 sync-93d506c0-1 分支进行修改或者使用 Github Desktop 拉取此 pr 修改并提交。
禁止使用 Squash Merge 来合并此 Pull Request！
使用该操作会导致上游仓库的内容丢失，并致使下一次合并产生冲突。